The ASRock X299 Taichi Motherboard Review
by Joe Shields on October 31, 2017 8:00 AM EST- Posted in
- Motherboards
- Intel
- ASRock
- SLI
- CrossFire
- Taichi
- X299
- Skylake-X
- Kaby Lake-X
CPU Performance, Short Form
For our motherboard reviews, we use our short form testing method. These tests usually focus on if a motherboard is using MultiCore Turbo (the feature used to have maximum turbo on at all times, giving a frequency advantage), or if there are slight gains to be had from tweaking the firmware. We leave the BIOS settings at default and memory at JEDEC (DDR4-2133 C15) for these tests, making it very easy to see which motherboards have MCT enabled by default.
Here we are including data from all the boards we have tested in the lab, including ones without a formal full review. It is noticable that the MSI motherboards adopt Multi-Core Turbo, although different boards seem to prioritise different benchmark styles for the turbo.
Blender 2.78: link
For a render that has been around for what seems like ages, Blender is still a highly popular tool. We managed to wrap up a standard workload into the February 5 nightly build of Blender and measure the time it takes to render the first frame of the scene. Being one of the bigger open source tools out there, it means both AMD and Intel work actively to help improve the codebase, for better or for worse on their own/each other's microarchitecture.
Blender testing results between the boards were close together, with the Taichi landed in the middle of the group taking 204 seconds to complete. The difference between the two ASRock boards would only be noticeable if you were keeping track of time. It would take a render over 3 hours to see a minute difference between them.
Rendering – POV-Ray 3.7: link
The Persistence of Vision Ray Tracer, or POV-Ray, is a freeware package for as the name suggests, ray tracing. It is a pure renderer, rather than modeling software, but the latest beta version contains a handy benchmark for stressing all processing threads on a platform. We have been using this test in motherboard reviews to test memory stability at various CPU speeds to good effect – if it passes the test, the IMC in the CPU is stable for a given CPU speed. As a CPU test, it runs for approximately 2-3 minutes on high end platforms.
Compression – WinRAR 5.4: link
Our WinRAR test from 2013 is updated to the latest version of WinRAR at the start of 2014. We compress a set of 2867 files across 320 folders totaling 1.52 GB in size – 95% of these files are small typical website files, and the rest (90% of the size) are small 30 second 720p videos.
In our WinRAR testing, the Taichi was in ahead of the i9, but still looking up at the other motherboards in this testing. Riding tall at the top are the MSI boards due to implementation of turbo modes.
Synthetic – 7-Zip 9.2: link
As an open source compression tool, 7-Zip is a popular tool for making sets of files easier to handle and transfer. The software offers up its own benchmark, to which we report the result.
For 7Zip, the results here are about the same with the Taichi in the middle scoring 58.9K with the Gaming i9 margin of error away below it at 58.7K. The Gaming Pro Carbon AC leads the group again scoring 61.1K or ~4% higher that the Taichi.
Point Calculations – 3D Movement Algorithm Test: link
3DPM is a self-penned benchmark, taking basic 3D movement algorithms used in Brownian Motion simulations and testing them for speed. High floating point performance, MHz and IPC wins in the single thread version, whereas the multithread version has to handle the threads and loves more cores. For a brief explanation of the platform agnostic coding behind this benchmark, see my forum post here.
Neuron Simulation - DigiCortex v1.20: link
The newest benchmark in our suite is DigiCortex, a simulation of biologically plausible neural network circuits, and simulates activity of neurons and synapses. DigiCortex relies heavily on a mix of DRAM speed and computational throughput, indicating that systems which apply memory profiles properly should benefit and those that play fast and loose with overclocking settings might get some extra speed up. Results are taken during the steady state period in a 32k neuron simulation and represented as a function of the ability to simulate in real time (1.000x equals real-time).
In our last system benchmark, DigiCortex, The Taichi takes its familiar spot in the middle of this pack at 1.16x realtime simulation. The Gaming i9 is just behind it at 1.15x while the Gaming Pro Carbon AC manages 1.21x.
17 Comments
View All Comments
UltraWide - Tuesday, October 31, 2017 - link
I love the PCIe lane chart, so simple and effective!hansmuff - Tuesday, October 31, 2017 - link
"Gaming is still a primary use on most motherboards and though 'Gaming' isn't in the Taichi's name, it keeps the same PCIe slot spacing, configuration, and slot protection as the Gaming i9, making the setup for multi-GPU configurations."I think you may have skipped a word :)
hansmuff - Tuesday, October 31, 2017 - link
And I replied to the wrong post. Oh well!Joe Shields - Wednesday, November 1, 2017 - link
Updated Yesterday. Good catch! Thank you!peevee - Tuesday, October 31, 2017 - link
"10 SATA ports"Why?
peterfares - Wednesday, November 1, 2017 - link
Yeah not sure why they're bothering with the controller to add the two extra.I guess some people need that many. Must want a lot of hard drives but not have them be externally connected through a NAS or other storage server.
jabber - Wednesday, November 1, 2017 - link
There will always be people that want to run the wrong hardware for the wrong job. Let them get on with it I say.ikjadoon - Tuesday, October 31, 2017 - link
I think this may have been left in body style instead of subheader style, on the overclocking page:Overclocking Results
Joe Shields - Tuesday, October 31, 2017 - link
Updated where needed. Thanks!Qasar - Tuesday, October 31, 2017 - link
so even with a 44 lane cpu, PCIe slot 5 has no connection ?? example.. vid card in Slot 1, sound card in slot 4, the x4 slot, so where would say a raid card go ?? slot 3 or slot 5?????