AnandTech Storage Bench - Light

Our Light storage test has relatively more sequential accesses and lower queue depths than The Destroyer or the Heavy test, and it's by far the shortest test overall. It's based largely on applications that aren't highly dependent on storage performance, so this is a test more of application launch times and file load times. This test can be seen as the sum of all the little delays in daily usage, but with the idle times trimmed to 25ms it takes less than half an hour to run. Details of the Light test can be found here. As with the ATSB Heavy test, this test is run with the drive both freshly erased and empty, and after filling the drive with sequential writes.

ATSB - Light (Data Rate)

As with the Heavy test, the average data rate of the Plextor M8V on the Light test is a bit on the slow side, but the M8V does quite well under the extra pressure of running the test on a full drive.

ATSB - Light (Average Latency)ATSB - Light (99th Percentile Latency)

The average latencies from the Plextor M8V are a bit higher than normal, but not to a great extent, and the full-drive score is pretty good. The situation for 99th percentile latencies is worse, with the M8V showing much higher tail latencies than most current SATA SSDs.

ATSB - Light (Average Read Latency)ATSB - Light (Average Write Latency)

The average read and write latencies from the Plextor M8V are both a bit higher than most drives but not enough to be a noticeable problem. The average read latency is more clearly lagging behind the competitors.

ATSB - Light (99th Percentile Read Latency)ATSB - Light (99th Percentile Write Latency)

The 99th percentile read latency of the Plextor M8V is a problem—5.6ms is quite a bit slower than the 2-3ms that most SATA SSDs manage. The 99th percentile write latency of the M8V is also higher than most drives, but it doesn't stand out as such a clear outlier.

ATSB - Light (Power)

The energy usage of the M8V on the Light test is only slightly higher than normal for the other Silicon Motion-based drives, and for SATA SSDs in general.

AnandTech Storage Bench - Heavy Random Performance
Comments Locked

8 Comments

View All Comments

  • edgineer - Tuesday, March 20, 2018 - link

    What's the actual capacity of this drive, 476 GiB? I hate having to use a calculator/guessing.
  • Billy Tallis - Tuesday, March 20, 2018 - link

    As with any other 512GB drive, the usable capacity (before partitioning) is 512,110,190,592 bytes.
  • Dragonstongue - Tuesday, March 20, 2018 - link

    Crucial MX200 500GB ends up as 465gb usable Win 7 64 build after formatted for use
    Crucial MX100 256 ends up with 238GB usable
  • frenchy_2001 - Tuesday, March 20, 2018 - link

    That would be because Windows displays GiB (2^30 bytes) and not GB (10^9 Bytes).
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gibibyte
  • bug77 - Thursday, March 22, 2018 - link

    During formatting, some space is reserved for the file system. That is not a limitation of the drive, nor does it make the drive have a smaller capacity.
    You don't like file system's overhead? Use a different file system. Oh wait, you can't do that on Windows :D
  • Holliday75 - Wednesday, March 21, 2018 - link

    These new bots are everywhere. Been seeing them all over Facebook posting on a few of my favorite professional sports teams pages.
  • FunBunny2 - Thursday, March 22, 2018 - link

    but, but, but... Mark just promised that they've been driving the culture at Facebook for years, years I say, to improve user experience. don't you believe him?????
  • leexgx - Sunday, March 25, 2018 - link

    can you please fix on mobile view in "Print this article" the "Thanks to" box overrides page width limits so when scrolling up and down it sometimes go left and right

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now