The ASRock X570 Aqua: A $1000 Ryzen Halo Motherboard Reviewed
by Gavin Bonshor on December 19, 2019 9:00 AM ESTOverclocking Ryzen 3000
Experience with the ASRock X570 Aqua
Ryzen 3000 runs very warmly, even at idle temperatures in comparison due to higher density packaged cores on its 7nm chiplets, and with the Aqua, a custom loop liquid setup with the integrated full cover monoblock should do the trick. In terms of our motherboard testing, it makes our Ryzen 7 3700X testbed processor slightly harder to cool than a processor such as the Ryzen 7 3900X. The reason for this is the cores are evenly split between two CCDs on the 3900X, whereas the 3700X has all its eight cores on a single CCD. This means that in our overclock testing, the Ryzen 7 3700X performs similarly on a custom loop when compared with a closed-loop liquid cooler.
Overclocking our Ryzen 7 3700X using the ASRock X570 Aqua is the quintessential typical mid-range motherboard we come to expect from ASRock, with the firmware laid out into easy to navigate sections. All of the overclocking settings users need can be found under the OC Tweaker section, with some of the more advanced Precision Boost Overdrive settings found under the advanced menu. Typically users will overclock the CPU and memory, and the ASRock X570 Aqua has two modes to select from, stable and OC mode. The only notable difference is the level of voltage for the CPU. The stable overclock mode allows users to use up to 1.500 V of CPU VCore, while the OC mode extends this to a whopping 2.500 V. Users can fine-tune memory latencies in the DRAM Timing Configuration menu, while changes to memory frequency can be made by altering the DRAM Frequency setting.
Compared with other ASRock models we have tested recently, the ASRock X570 Aqua ticks the right boxes for users looking to overclock and squeeze all of that unlocked performance. The key variable to consider with the Aqua is that it's designed for enthusiasts looking to benefit from the reduced operating temperatures with water cooling, and potentially eke out any extra performance available from the silicon. ASRock did inform us that its most beneficial testing was performed with a Ryzen 9 3950X processor which at the time of writing, isn't released yet. The ASRock X570 Aqua does include a small overclockers toolkit at the bottom right-hand side of the board with a two-digit LED debugger, a power button, and a reset button.
Overclocking Methodology
Our standard overclocking methodology is as follows. We select the automatic overclock options and test for stability with POV-Ray and OCCT to simulate high-end workloads. These stability tests aim to catch any immediate causes for memory or CPU errors.
For manual overclocks, based on the information gathered from the previous testing, starts off at a nominal voltage and CPU multiplier, and the multiplier is increased until the stability tests are failed. The CPU voltage is increased gradually until the stability tests are passed, and the process repeated until the motherboard reduces the multiplier automatically (due to safety protocol) or the CPU temperature reaches a stupidly high level (105ºC+). Our testbed is not in a case, which should push overclocks higher with fresher (cooler) air.
Overclocking Results
In our overclocking results with the ASRock X570 Aqua, the board at the default load-line calibration profile displayed good levels of VDroop throughout our testing. Going from 3.6 GHz to 4.2 GHz with 1.250 V on the CPU VCore, the X570 Aqua under full load consistently undervolted by 0.031 V. Fewer volts at load than a system needs can reduce temperatures, and with the design of the Aqua, means marginally less heat when considering the monoblock cools the VRM and X570 chipset too. Going up to 4.3 GHz at 1.350 V on the CPU VCore, our Ryzen 7 3700X consistently remained at 1.331 V under load. This equates to 0.019 V which when compared directly to the same results as the ASRock X570 Phantom Gaming-ITX/TB3 model with the same settings meant 3 W less of power consumption at full load.
In our POV-Ray benchmark, the scores, along with power consumption and CPU core temperature gradually increased as we went up in each of our 100 MHz increments. Like the X570 Phantom Gaming-ITX/TB3 model, the ASRock X570 Aqua also includes its own Eco mode which when combined with our Ryzen 7 3700X processor, drops the TDP from 65 W to just 35 W. This is designed for low powered systems such as HTPCs that still require grunt on demand. Unfortunately, the Eco mode proved highly unstable when we applied a load, and we hope this is either an anomaly or if it can be rectified in a later firmware revision. Enabling Precision Boost Overdrive yielded no benefit when compared with the default settings, which leads us to believe the auto setting means PBO is enabled by default.
84 Comments
View All Comments
TheinsanegamerN - Thursday, December 19, 2019 - link
What a worthless board. It doesnt matter how cool those power components are VS other boards, the performance isnt even there. The fact that this board more often then not is on the lower end of many of the performance graphs says a LOT. Ryzen 3000 just doesnt have any headroom left in it!To meet the fool that would spend a GRAND on this thing. I'll hapilly sell him my athlon 64 system for $850. Even for heavy use of a 3950x this board doesnt offer anything that a dedicated CPU block cant already do. The fact you can set up a custom loop, buy a high end X570 board, case, case fans, and other goodies and still spend less money then this board alone costs is impressive.
hbsource - Thursday, December 19, 2019 - link
I think you're being too narrow in the 'worth' of this product. It's 'worthless' to you because of performance numbers.A Chanel handbag has the same performance numbers as a free plastic bag. But it is worth a lot more.
TheinsanegamerN - Thursday, December 19, 2019 - link
What "worth" does this board offer? If it has no performance boost, what exactly is the point? To be fashionable?The chanel handbag comparison doesnt work, a free plastic bag wont last nearly as long in day to day use, they are meant to be temporary. The chanel bag will at least work properly for awhile, assuming you take care of it. But the *worth* of that bag comes from its designer pedigree. Asrock doesnt have that. Asrock isnt considred a premium brand. Besides, you dont strut around with your motherboard in hand, it goes into your computer where likely you are the only one whom will ever see it. Outside of a sig on your forum handle, nobody will know you spent a grand on this thing.
computer parts are sold on performance, not fashion. Even if your idea of "performance" is low temps, there already exist waterblocks to cool down motherboards, for a tenth the price. This thing is a total waste of money.
Vepsa - Thursday, December 19, 2019 - link
The worth as I see it for most systems built with this board are going to be show off systems in a store that show how cleanly the builder can build a watercooled system. Nothing else. If I were a small system builder (actually a dream of mine to open a computer store near where I live), that is what I'd use it for. Is it worth it do you? Nope, but thats fine. Its not meant to be worth it to everyone.A5 - Thursday, December 19, 2019 - link
Small-time system builders don't have the margins to waste a grand on this kind of thing as a "show piece", unless they're hoping to sell it to some rich sucker for a huge markup.Foeketijn - Friday, December 20, 2019 - link
Depends on your clientèle. I can even imagen some fancy workplace-o-rent asking for 15 of these systems.Try to buy a well speced boutique system with an 3950X 64Gb 4Tb SSD etc without at least a 1k mark up. Or just any Apple Workstation. As long as you don't join the race to the bottom, there is enough margin in the retail industry.
goatfajitas - Thursday, December 19, 2019 - link
"computer parts are sold on performance, not fashion"That is not true. True for some sure, but not overall true.
bji - Thursday, December 19, 2019 - link
True for the vast majority, not just some.FreckledTrout - Thursday, December 19, 2019 - link
I would bet looks cover a vast majority especially if we count laptops.lazarpandar - Thursday, December 19, 2019 - link
We're talking about motherboards... an internal component of desktops. Attempting to include more products to accomodate hbsource's insane analogy is dishonest.