As an interesting dynamic to our testing, it has been requested that we see how well the C2750 does in our discrete GPU benchmarks. The combination of a slower CPU and limited PCIe bandwidth will be the major culprit in almost all our benchmarks, although Tomb Raider is at least on an even keel. Most of our benchmarks show a 30+ FPS frame rate, if you are willing to pair a large GPU with the C2750D4I.  Again, we are currently testing other 25W platforms to provide more applicable competition for this platform.

F1 2013

First up is F1 2013 by Codemasters. I am a big Formula 1 fan in my spare time, and nothing makes me happier than carving up the field in a Caterham, waving to the Red Bulls as I drive by (because I play on easy and take shortcuts). F1 2013 uses the EGO Engine, and like other Codemasters games ends up being very playable on old hardware quite easily. In order to beef up the benchmark a bit, we devised the following scenario for the benchmark mode: one lap of Spa-Francorchamps in the heavy wet, the benchmark follows Jenson Button in the McLaren who starts on the grid in 22nd place, with the field made up of 11 Williams cars, 5 Marussia and 5 Caterham in that order. This puts emphasis on the CPU to handle the AI in the wet, and allows for a good amount of overtaking during the automated benchmark. We test at 1920x1080 on Ultra graphical settings.

F1 2013: 1080p Max, 1x GTX 770

F1 2013, 1080p Max
  NVIDIA AMD
Average Frame Rates
Minimum Frame Rates

Bioshock Infinite

Bioshock Infinite was Zero Punctuation’s Game of the Year for 2013, uses the Unreal Engine 3, and is designed to scale with both cores and graphical prowess. We test the benchmark using the Adrenaline benchmark tool and the Xtreme (1920x1080, Maximum) performance setting, noting down the average frame rates and the minimum frame rates.

Bioshock Infinite: 1080p Max, 1x GTX 770

Bioshock Infinite, 1080p Max
  NVIDIA AMD
Average Frame Rates
Minimum Frame Rates

During our Bioshock Infinite test there was a clear stutter during the benchmark that would make the game completely unplayable.

Tomb Raider

The next benchmark in our test is Tomb Raider. Tomb Raider is an AMD optimized game, lauded for its use of TressFX creating dynamic hair to increase the immersion in game. Tomb Raider uses a modified version of the Crystal Engine, and enjoys raw horsepower. We test the benchmark using the Adrenaline benchmark tool and the Xtreme (1920x1080, Maximum) performance setting, noting down the average frame rates and the minimum frame rates.

Tomb Raider: 1080p Max, 1x GTX 770

Tomb Raider, 1080p Max
  NVIDIA AMD
Average Frame Rates
Minimum Frame Rates

Tomb Raider is a game that seems to move almost entirely onto the GPU, not worrying much about the CPU or the DRAM attached to it.

Scientific and Synthetic Benchmarks Gaming Benchmarks: Sleeping Dogs, Company of Heroes 2 and Battlefield 4
Comments Locked

85 Comments

View All Comments

  • A5 - Tuesday, April 29, 2014 - link

    For HTPC, I'd think you would probably want to get a small GPU for decode help anyway, so that would be where your audio comes from as well.
  • bernstein - Tuesday, April 29, 2014 - link

    yeah it's a shame this doesn't come with a hdmi connector... then i'd be sold. even though i wouldn't use any of the sata plugs and just hook a sas controller+expander up to it...
    hdmi + ecc + pcie x8 capability cpu+mobo for $400 would be a steal
  • slayernine - Tuesday, April 29, 2014 - link

    QNAP's Intel Atom models have HDMI.
  • bernstein - Tuesday, April 29, 2014 - link

    yeah if only they had fanless 10+ bay models for less than $1000.
  • bernstein - Tuesday, April 29, 2014 - link

    oh and one that runs zfs
  • Gralgrathor - Thursday, May 21, 2015 - link

    10+ disks without cooling? They won't last a day... And why would you need a hdmi-connector on a server mobo?
  • DanNeely - Tuesday, April 29, 2014 - link

    At $400 it's priced out of the core HTPC market; it's clearly intended as an entry level large storage server. As pointed out below, the spaghetti explosion from wiring a dozen drives with individual cables makes it unsuitable for most enterprise use (or prosumers who know better).
  • Samus - Wednesday, April 30, 2014 - link

    For $400 you could put together a better HTPC/NAS combo solution with an AMD AM1 ITX system and an Areca SAS RAID card in a PCIe slot. You'd get a superior onboard GPU with HDMI, native USB 3.0, and a better RAID card, not some Marvell crap.

    Athlon 5350 http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N8...

    ASUS AM1 ITX http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N8...

    Areca PCIe 8-port SAS http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N8...

    This motherboard is interesting and ASRock is a solid consumer OEM, but it's a little premature of them to be getting into rack space.
  • UpSpin - Wednesday, April 30, 2014 - link

    You don't have to buy the overpriced octa core board, but could buy the identical quad core version ASRock C2550D4I for $280.
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N8...

    Your mainboard doesn't support ECC RAM and your SAS Controller only supports 8 SATA drives without further expanders. Together with the two SATA connectors on the mainboard you got only 10.

    The quad core has an even lower TDP of 14W vs. 20W of the octa version. The C2750 has a faster CPU compared to your Athlon 5350.

    The only disadvantage is the poor IGP. Considering that this is more a storage/server board, less a HTPC (who wants 12 noisy hard drives in the living room?) and the unbeatable price, it's a very interesting porduct in my opinion.
  • Samus - Friday, May 2, 2014 - link

    Well, UpSpin, that would be why I said 'htpc/nas'

    If you purely want a NAS, there are probably better solutions than what I outlined, but for a hybrid (and who is to say the NAS wont be SSD's or 2.5" 2TB drives that are dead silent) this board, like Ian pointed out, is kind of a joke for an HTPC solution. It is VERY market specific, and virtually ALL AT readers aren't part of that market. This board is grossly overpriced, especially for something with ASRocks name on it. Even cold-storage servers should have USB 3.0 or eSATA. and quality products don't use some buggy $3.00 Marvell chipset that wipes arrays at random.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now