HP TouchSmart 610: For Business or Pleasure
by Dustin Sklavos on November 2, 2011 2:50 PM ESTGaming Performance
Reflecting the slower nature of all-in-one graphics, I've elected not to run our "Ultra" testing suite on the HP TouchSmart 610 and odds are I won't for any future all-in-ones. The hardware is simply too slow, because as you'll see by these "High" settings, 1080p is just too much work for a midrange mobile-class graphics part.
Disappointment sets in. To produce a gaming workload that would be at least a little more reasonable, I'll be testing all-in-ones at the "Medium" preset we use for notebooks (except employing DirectX 11 in all cases). At medium settings things improve a little, as DiRT 2, Left 4 Dead 2, STALKER: Call of Pripyat, and StarCraft II all break the 30fps mark. Really the bare minimum for a 1080p screen is a GTX 460M/560M, which is based on the desktop GeForce GTS 450 (a stand-in for which you can see in the slower Quadro 2000), or on the AMD side we'd want the HD 6850M or above.
19 Comments
View All Comments
WasabiVengeance - Wednesday, November 2, 2011 - link
When reviewing a product, I'd think it obvious that you should compare it to its actual competitors (iMac). While I realize that some benchmarks can't be easily replicated (gaming), certainly the screen, boot times, and power draw could've been compared.retrospooty - Wednesday, November 2, 2011 - link
"I'd think it obvious that you should compare it to its actual competitors (iMac"What is an iMac ?
shin0bi272 - Wednesday, November 2, 2011 - link
original versionhttp://lowendmac.com/imacs/rev-a-imac-g3-233-mhz.h...
and the current version
http://www.apple.com/imac/
current one doesnt look too bad but its hella expensive for what you get.
retrospooty - Thursday, November 3, 2011 - link
LOL, thanks... I was being sarcastic though. He said "compare it to actual competitors" so I was clowning on Mac'sKoolAidMan1 - Friday, November 4, 2011 - link
That 27" display by itself is $1100 from Dell or $1400 from NEC. That there's an i5 or i7 computer built in actually makes it a pretty good value.RamarC - Wednesday, November 2, 2011 - link
i doubt anyone is deciding between this hp touchsmart and an imac. the decision is mac or PC and then which model mac or pc.Spivonious - Wednesday, November 2, 2011 - link
I can see placing this on a desk in "kiosk" mode and using it as a touch only computer. Does HP have any plans on selling just the screen?Roland00Address - Wednesday, November 2, 2011 - link
Not the same monitor, but look into the Dell st2220t 21.5 inch CCFL backlit, 6-bit E-IPS. It is 329 and works with any computer that is Vista or 7. It has been on sale routinely for $250 and once as low as $210.jrs77 - Wednesday, November 2, 2011 - link
Well, I'd actually like a device like that, but the screens are very lacking, especially in the touch-department.Resistive touchpanels are crap. Plain and simple. Additionally glossy screens are crap aswell, especially when they're ment to touch.
So, make one of these with a matte, capacitive multitouch screen and I might actually consider such a system.
Or even better, make one, that works like a pentablet with pressure-sensitive input like the Wacom Cintiq 24HD.
angelzero - Wednesday, November 2, 2011 - link
Only if this had an Active digitizer it would have been great.What's up with all the touch screens now not having active digitizer.